Ernest J. Newman, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ernest J. Newman, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 695

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 1958

DocketReap. Dec. 9075; Entry No. I. A. D. 472446

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 695 (Ernest J. Newman, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest J. Newman, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 695 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver,' Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited to 2,500 packets of genuine cut unset marcasites, identified on the invoice as being contained in cases PP-3 to PP-9, inclusive, exported from Switzerland and entered at the port of New York.

The case is before me on an agreed set of facts, establishing that export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value for the articles is $3 per packet, less 5 per centum discount, plus cost of packing, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver,' Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited to 2,500 packets of genuine cut unset marcasites, identified on the invoice as being contained in cases PP-3 to PP-9, inclusive, exported from Switzerland and entered at the port of New York.

The case is before me on an agreed set of facts, establishing that export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value for the articles is $3 per packet, less 5 per centum discount, plus cost of packing, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Cust. Ct. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-j-newman-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.