Ernest Horvath v. Don Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 2011·No. 139996·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 13, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

139996-7 (59) Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly, ERNEST HORVATH, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 139996-7 COA: 283931, 284842 Wayne CC: 07-713287-NI DON JOHNSON and SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, d/b/a SMART, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 30, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, there being no majority in favor of granting reconsideration.

YOUNG, C.J., and CORRIGAN and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant reconsideration for the reasons set forth in Justice CORRIGAN’s dissenting statement in this case, 487 Mich ___ (2010).

MARY BETH KELLY, J., not participating.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 13, 2011 _________________________________________ 0112 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernest Horvath v. Don Johnson, (Mich. 2011).

Ernest Horvath v. Don Johnson (Ernest Horvath v. Don Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.