Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. Superior Grocers

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: April 20, 2026
• Docket: 2:24-cv-03754
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST GODFREY LOGAN, Jr., Case No. 2:24-cv-3754-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SUPERIOR GROCERS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings 19 and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any 20 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21 8.) No objections were filed and the time to do so has elapsed. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 27 the record and by the proper analysis. 28 /// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 16, 2025, ECF No. 8, 3 | are ADOPTED in full; 4 2. This action 1s dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely complete service of 5 || process; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 | Date: April 17, 2026 9 10 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28