Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al.

E.D. California

Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al.

DecidedSeptember 10, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-02743

StatusUnknown

This text of Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al. (Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST GODFREY LOGAN, JR., No. 2:24-cv-2743-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DPSS PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES; et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) proceeds in this matter pro se. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B). 21 On August 11, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days (14). (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff did not file 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 28 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the magistrate judge’s 1 analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2025 (ECF No. 9) are ADOPTED 3 in full; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 6 Date: September 9, 2025

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST GODFREY LOGAN, JR., No. 2:24-cv-2743-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DPSS PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES; et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) proceeds in this matter pro se. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B). 21 On August 11, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days (14). (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff did not file 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 28 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the magistrate judge’s 1 analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2025 (ECF No. 9) are ADOPTED 3 in full; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 6 Date: September 9, 2025

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. DPSS Public Social Services; et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-godfrey-logan-jr-v-dpss-public-social-services-et-al-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack