Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8

Fourth Circuit

Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8

537 F.2d 77, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12045

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 1976·No. 75-1426·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and of the district court’s opinion discloses that an appeal from the order of the district court denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 would be without merit. Accordingly, although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its order. Minns v Simpson, 391 F.Supp. 1156 (W.D.Va.1975) See also Sweet v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, 529 F.2d 854 (4th Cir., 1975)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and of the district court’s opinion discloses that an appeal from the order of the district court denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 would be without merit. Accordingly, although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its order. Minns v Simpson, 391 F.Supp. 1156 (W.D.Va.1975) See also Sweet v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, 529 F.2d 854 (4th Cir., 1975)

Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8, 537 F.2d 77, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12045 (4th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

537 F.2d 77 (Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related