Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8

537 F.2d 77, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12045
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1976
Docket75-1426
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 F.2d 77 (Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ernest George Minns v. Simpson, D. E., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supt. Of Harrisonburg Correctional Field Unit 8, 537 F.2d 77, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12045 (4th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and of the district court’s opinion discloses that an appeal from the order of the district court denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 would be without merit. Accordingly, although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its order. Minns v Simpson, 391 F.Supp. 1156 (W.D.Va.1975) See also Sweet v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, 529 F.2d 854 (4th Cir., 1975)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. Martin
755 F. Supp. 683 (E.D. North Carolina, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 F.2d 77, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-george-minns-v-simpson-d-e-individually-and-in-his-official-ca4-1976.