Ernest F. Coble, Jr. v. Piedmont Farm Credit Bobby D. Goodin

Fourth Circuit

Ernest F. Coble, Jr. v. Piedmont Farm Credit Bobby D. Goodin

16 F.3d 408, 1994 WL 31442

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1994

Docket93-2430

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 408 (Ernest F. Coble, Jr. v. Piedmont Farm Credit Bobby D. Goodin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest F. Coble, Jr. v. Piedmont Farm Credit Bobby D. Goodin, 16 F.3d 408, 1994 WL 31442 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ernest F. COBLE, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
PIEDMONT FARM CREDIT; Bobby D. Goodin, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-2430.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided: Feb. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham; William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge.

Ernest F. Coble, Jr., appellant pro se.

Stephen McDaniel Russell, Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A., Winston-Salem, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action relating to a loan foreclosure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coble v. Piedmont Farm Credit, No. CA-93-292-3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ernest F. COBLE, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
PIEDMONT FARM CREDIT; Bobby D. Goodin, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-2430.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided: Feb. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham; William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge.

Ernest F. Coble, Jr., appellant pro se.

Stephen McDaniel Russell, Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A., Winston-Salem, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action relating to a loan foreclosure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coble v. Piedmont Farm Credit, No. CA-93-292-3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 408, 1994 WL 31442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-f-coble-jr-v-piedmont-farm-credit-bobby-d-g-ca4-1994.