Ernest Edward Shaw v. Edward W. Murray, Director Attorney General of Virginia
This text of 809 F.2d 786 (Ernest Edward Shaw v. Edward W. Murray, Director Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
809 F.2d 786
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ernest Edward SHAW, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director; Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 86-6780.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 28, 1986.
Decided Jan. 9, 1987.
Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Ernest Edward Shaw, appellant pro se.
Richard B. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that an appeal from his order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Shaw v. Murray, C/A No. 86-356-R (E.D.Va., Sept. 18, 1986).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
809 F.2d 786, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 871, 1987 WL 36186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-edward-shaw-v-edward-w-murray-director-attorney-general-of-ca4-1987.