Ernest A. Hingle v. Chalin O. Perez

434 F.2d 1037
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 1970
Docket1037
StatusPublished

This text of 434 F.2d 1037 (Ernest A. Hingle v. Chalin O. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ernest A. Hingle v. Chalin O. Perez, 434 F.2d 1037 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

434 F.2d 1037

Ernest A. HINGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Chalin O. PEREZ et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 29932 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,

431 F.2d 409, PartI.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1970.

Benjamin E. Smith, of Smith & Scheuermann, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Sidney W. Provensal, Jr., Marcel Livaudais Jr., of Provensal & Fitzmaurice, New Orleans, La., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana at New Orleans; Alvin B. Rubin, Judge.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Hingle v. Perez, 312 F.Supp. 127 (E.D.La.1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F.2d 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-a-hingle-v-chalin-o-perez-ca5-1970.