Ernest A. Hingle v. Chalin O. Perez
This text of 434 F.2d 1037 (Ernest A. Hingle v. Chalin O. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
434 F.2d 1037
Ernest A. HINGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Chalin O. PEREZ et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 29932 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,
431 F.2d 409, PartI.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 4, 1970.
Benjamin E. Smith, of Smith & Scheuermann, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Sidney W. Provensal, Jr., Marcel Livaudais Jr., of Provensal & Fitzmaurice, New Orleans, La., for appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana at New Orleans; Alvin B. Rubin, Judge.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Hingle v. Perez, 312 F.Supp. 127 (E.D.La.1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 F.2d 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-a-hingle-v-chalin-o-perez-ca5-1970.