Ermilo Barrients v. Beeville Independent School District

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2006
Docket13-06-00506-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ermilo Barrients v. Beeville Independent School District (Ermilo Barrients v. Beeville Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ermilo Barrients v. Beeville Independent School District, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-506-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________



ERMILO BARRIENTS, Appellant,



v.


BEEVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 36th District Court
of Bee County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, ERMILO BARRIENTS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-05-1419-CV-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on August 8, 2006. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on September 7, 2006, but was not filed until September 11, 2006.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 2nd day of November, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ermilo Barrients v. Beeville Independent School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ermilo-barrients-v-beeville-independent-school-dis-texapp-2006.