Ermer v. La Duca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ermer v. La Duca

7 A.D.2d 623, 179 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4430

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 623 (Ermer v. La Duca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ermer v. La Duca, 7 A.D.2d 623, 179 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed as matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. If the parties do not agree as to the time and extent of the discovery and inspection, those matters shall be determined by the Monroe County Court. Memorandum: The denial of the motion by the County Judge was an improvident exercise of discretion. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe County Court denying plaintiff’s motion for permission to take photographs of work performed and materials furnished by him at the residence of defendant, and denying his application to permit his experts to ascertain the finished work performed by plaintiff.) Present — McCum, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed as matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. If the parties do not agree as to the time and extent of the discovery and inspection, those matters shall be determined by the Monroe County Court. Memorandum: The denial of the motion by the County Judge was an improvident exercise of discretion. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe County Court denying plaintiff’s motion for permission to take photographs of work performed and materials furnished by him at the residence of defendant, and denying his application to permit his experts to ascertain the finished work performed by plaintiff.) Present — McCum, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 623, 179 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ermer-v-la-duca-nyappdiv-1958.