Erma Evans v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Com
This text of 304 F. App'x 468 (Erma Evans v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Com) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Erma Evans appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of partial summary judgment in her diversity lawsuit seeking insurance benefits and punitive damages for, inter alia, bad faith and negligence. After viewing the record de novo, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 F. App'x 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erma-evans-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-com-ca8-2008.