Erlwein v. Cantey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erlwein v. Cantey

11 A.D.2d 1072, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1072 (Erlwein v. Cantey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erlwein v. Cantey, 11 A.D.2d 1072, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to bar defendants from any claim in land purchased by plaintiff at a sale for unpaid taxes, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 8, 1960, which, inter alia, denies his motion for summary judgment, striking out the answer of the defendant R. W. Wallace, Jr., Inc.; denies plaintiff’s motion for renewal of his said motion for summary judgment; and grants the cross motion of the defendant Vera Walls to the extent of substituting her as a party defendant in place of the defendant R. W. Wallace, Jr., Inc. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Christ, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to bar defendants from any claim in land purchased by plaintiff at a sale for unpaid taxes, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 8, 1960, which, inter alia, denies his motion for summary judgment, striking out the answer of the defendant R. W. Wallace, Jr., Inc.; denies plaintiff’s motion for renewal of his said motion for summary judgment; and grants the cross motion of the defendant Vera Walls to the extent of substituting her as a party defendant in place of the defendant R. W. Wallace, Jr., Inc. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Christ, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1072, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erlwein-v-cantey-nyappdiv-1960.