Erlanger v. Avegno
This text of 24 La. Ann. 77 (Erlanger v. Avegno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant for 11,580 58-10Ó francs, and defendant appealed.
The only point made by appellant is that the judgment is erroneous, in being- rendered for francs instead of for an equivalent amount of dollars and cents.
We think the judgment should ho amended in this respect. R. S. 1870, § 4; Marshall v. Grand Gulf Railroad, 5 An. 360 ; Gallearo v. Pierre, 18 An. 10.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from bo amended, as to tho expression of its amount, by substituting- for tho number of francs therein stated the sum of two thousand one hundred and fifty-three dollars and ninety-nine cents, and that as thus amended the said judgment he affirmed; appellee to pay costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 La. Ann. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erlanger-v-avegno-la-1872.