Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken
This text of 168 A. 297 (Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court, to whom the matter was submitted by consent, which is printed in 11 N. J. Mis. R. 122.
■For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A. 297, 111 N.J.L. 243, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erion-v-board-of-pension-commrs-hoboken-nj-1933.