Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel
This text of Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel (Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-18-00687-CV Style: Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel Date motion filed*: October 1, 2018 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s Counsel Oliver J. Brown Document to be filed: N/A
Is appeal accelerated? No.
Ordered that motion is: Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and appellant’s new counsel has been substituted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Oliver J. Brown as counsel for appellant.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: October 9, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erin-broussard-v-roy-arnel-texapp-2018.