Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 9, 2018·No. 01-18-00687-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00687-CV Style: Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel Date motion filed*: October 1, 2018 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s Counsel Oliver J. Brown Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and appellant’s new counsel has been substituted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Oliver J. Brown as counsel for appellant.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: October 9, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel (Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.