Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 9, 2018
Docket01-18-00687-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel (Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00687-CV Style: Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel Date motion filed*: October 1, 2018 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s Counsel Oliver J. Brown Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and appellant’s new counsel has been substituted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Oliver J. Brown as counsel for appellant.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: October 9, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erin-broussard-v-roy-arnel-texapp-2018.