Erikson v. Ward

185 Ill. App. 269
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 9, 1914
DocketGen. No. 18,783
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 Ill. App. 269 (Erikson v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erikson v. Ward, 185 Ill. App. 269 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Election oe ¡remedies, § 3*—when court of equity may compel election. If after a bill in equity has been filed, so that the jurisdiction of the court has attached and the case is not one where a party may proceed, as in the case of a mortgage, in equity and at law at the same time, the court of equity will compel the party to make an election in which court he will proceed and the proceedings in the other court will be stayed. 4. Appeal and error, § 1705*—when objection not urged as ground for new trial is waived. On appeal from a judgment awarding a building contractor a recovery for labor and materials furnished under a building contract, an objection that the contractor had not obtained a city license is waived where such objection was not urged as a ground in defendant’s motion for a new trial. 5. Building and construction contracts, § 105*—when modification of requested instruction not error. In an action to recover for work and materials performed under a building contract, trial court’s modification of instructions asked by defendant by inserting the words “substantially” and “reasonable,” held not error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Illinois Minerals Co. v. Miller
65 N.E.2d 44 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Ill. App. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erikson-v-ward-illappct-1914.