Eriksen v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eriksen v. Town of Brookhaven

119 A.D.2d 674, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55591

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 674 (Eriksen v. Town of Brookhaven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eriksen v. Town of Brookhaven, 119 A.D.2d 674, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Planning, Environment and Development of the Town of Brookhaven, effective September 4, 1984, which terminated the petitioner’s employment as a probationary building inspector, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated May 6, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was substantial compliance with Suffolk County Civil Service rule XIII (6) (see, Reilly v Shaw, 81 AD2d 610). The determination under review was not arbitrary or capricious (see, Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637, 639), and the petitioner, as a probationary employee, had no right to a hearing (Matter of Bonney v Dilworth, 99 AD2d 468). We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Planning, Environment and Development of the Town of Brookhaven, effective September 4, 1984, which terminated the petitioner’s employment as a probationary building inspector, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated May 6, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was substantial compliance with Suffolk County Civil Service rule XIII (6) (see, Reilly v Shaw, 81 AD2d 610). The determination under review was not arbitrary or capricious (see, Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637, 639), and the petitioner, as a probationary employee, had no right to a hearing (Matter of Bonney v Dilworth, 99 AD2d 468). We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 674, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eriksen-v-town-of-brookhaven-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack