Eriksen v. Howe

241 A.D. 698

This text of 241 A.D. 698 (Eriksen v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eriksen v. Howe, 241 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Orders, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to be made and production and discovery to be had on five days’ notice. Under the pleadings plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory judgment for an accounting. The only possible question to be litigated is the interests of the parties in the invention. Therefore, the examination before trial allowed is more than required. Upon the taking of the account, either directly upon the granting of the interlocutory judgment or before a referee, plaintiff will have ample opportunity to inquire into details of money and property received by defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eriksen-v-howe-nyappdiv-1934.