Erik Leonard v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas The Harris County-Houston Sports Authority Harris County And the City of Houston

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2020
Docket03-19-00771-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Erik Leonard v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas The Harris County-Houston Sports Authority Harris County And the City of Houston (Erik Leonard v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas The Harris County-Houston Sports Authority Harris County And the City of Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erik Leonard v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas The Harris County-Houston Sports Authority Harris County And the City of Houston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00771-CV

Erik Leonard, Appellant

v.

Ken Paxton,1 Attorney General of Texas; the Harris County-Houston Sports Authority; Harris County; and the City of Houston, Appellees

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-GN-06-000810, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant Erik Leonard has filed a notice of appeal. Appellant, however, has

been designated a vexatious litigant.

A vexatious litigant must comply with the procedures set forth in Chapter 11 of

the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code as a prerequisite to filing “new litigation,” including

obtaining permission from the appropriate local administrative judge to file an appeal. See Tex.

Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.102 (generally prohibiting vexatious litigant from filing “new

litigation” without permission from local administrative judge), .103 (generally prohibiting clerk

of court from filing “litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a

vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an

1 Leonard’s notice of appeal named Greg Abbott as Attorney General of Texas. We automatically substitute his successor in that office, Ken Paxton. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a). order from the appropriate local administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting

the filing”); Johnson v. Hughey, No. 06-12-00079-CV, 2012 WL 4761546, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Texarkana Oct. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). The appropriate local administrative judge

with respect to the filing of this appeal is:

The Honorable Tim Sulak 353rd District Court Travis County Courthouse P. O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767.

Accordingly, this appeal is immediately stayed. This Court orders appellant

within fifteen days of the date of this order to demonstrate to this Court that he has obtained

permission from the local administrative judge to file this appeal. If he fails to comply with this

order within fifteen days of the date of this order, this Court will dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction.

It is ordered on February 28, 2020.

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 11.102
Texas CP § 11.102

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Erik Leonard v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas The Harris County-Houston Sports Authority Harris County And the City of Houston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erik-leonard-v-ken-paxton-attorney-general-of-texas-the-harris-texapp-2020.