Erik Electric Co. v. Elliot

403 So. 2d 1041, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 1981·No. No. 81-40·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court for the second time. In the first case we reversed the final judgment which had granted a directed verdict at the end of the plaintiff’s case. Erik Electric Company, Inc., v. Elliot, 375 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We now reverse again and remand with instructions to enter judgment for the appellant on the accounting of profits realized from use of the customer lists and to hear evidence on monetary damages. We conclude that appellee presented no competent evidence to refute the appellant’s prima facie case showing that distilled listings constituted a trade secret. See Erik Electric Company, supra. See, e. g., Kelly v. Kinsey, 362 So.2d 402, 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (opinion of witness worth no more than the reasons on which it is based). Accord, Le Fevre v. Bear, 113 So.2d 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erik Electric Co. v. Elliot, 403 So. 2d 1041, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

403 So. 2d 1041 (Erik Electric Co. v. Elliot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erik Elec. Co., Inc. v. Elliot
375 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Kelly v. Kinsey
362 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Le Fevre v. Bear
113 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)