Erie Railroad v. Furry
This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 880 (Erie Railroad v. Furry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Furry sued the Erie Railroad Company before a justice of the peace to recover damages for burning his fences, grass, pasture and meadow, claiming that the engines which set the fire were out of order when they ran through his farm. The justice gave judgment against the railroad company for $213.00, and the common pleas on error affirmed the judgment. The circuit court reversed the justice and common jileas, and held that the justice had no jurisdiction: that the action involved the title or possession to real estate which it was incumbent on the plaintiff to establish in order to maintain his suit, and that it was jot an action of trespass to realty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ohio C.C. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-railroad-v-furry-ohiocirct-1894.