Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
103 A. 1052, 90 N.J.L. 673, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 389
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 N.J.L. 57 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, tor the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance■—The Chancellor, Mintuen, Kaliscti, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Pabkeb, Bee-gen, Heppeniteimer, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 103 A. 1052, 90 N.J.L. 673, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 389 (N.J. 1917).
103 A. 1052 (Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.