Erie R. Co. v. Erie & Wyoming Val. R.

100 F. 808, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5132, 1900 WL 6
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 31, 1900
DocketNo. 5
StatusPublished

This text of 100 F. 808 (Erie R. Co. v. Erie & Wyoming Val. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erie R. Co. v. Erie & Wyoming Val. R., 100 F. 808, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5132, 1900 WL 6 (circtedpa 1900).

Opinion

McPHERSON, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction against the Pennsylvania Goal Company and the Erie & Wyoming Valley Kailroad 'Company. At the hearing the complainant abandoned the application so far as the coal company is concerned, and it remains, therefore, to consider whether the motion should prevail against the other defendant.- In my opinion, the injunction should not be granted. The court is asked to restrain the Wyoming Company from building a line of railway from Hawley to Lackawaxen, the principal ground of the application being that the Wyoming Company has leased to the complainant another line of railway between these two points, and is bound by a traffic agreement to ship certain freight over this line; a contract which the complainant declares will be broken by the Wyoming Company if the new line is allowed to be built. I do not think the ground is sufficient to support the order that the court is now asked to make. The injunction prayed for is directed, not against a diversion of traffic, but against the construction of a railroad, the allegation being that the defendant may, or will, put the road to an unlawful use. This, I think, would be an improper exercise of power. If the road should be built, and if the Wyoming Company should attempt to use it in violation of the complainant’s contract rights, the courts will no doubt be able to find a proper remedy for that particular injury. At present no ground is shown for equitable interference with the construction of the road.

The charter power of the Wyoming Company to build the line in question is not raised by the bill, and has not been considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F. 808, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5132, 1900 WL 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-r-co-v-erie-wyoming-val-r-circtedpa-1900.