Erie Insurance Exchange v. McGee

474 A.2d 1171, 327 Pa. Super. 56, 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4592
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 27, 1984
Docket230
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 474 A.2d 1171 (Erie Insurance Exchange v. McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erie Insurance Exchange v. McGee, 474 A.2d 1171, 327 Pa. Super. 56, 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4592 (Pa. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, Stanley S. and Lorraine L. McGee appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for delay damages under Pa.R.C.P. 238 in their uninsured motorist arbitration award against appellee Erie Insurance Exchange hereinafter Erie. The trial court held only that the Supreme Court did not intend to award prejudgment delay damages to be awarded to successful plaintiffs under arbitration clauses such as that found in Erie’s uninsured motorist policy. Pursuant to Erie’s request that the trial court modify the arbitrator’s award, the court held that the arbitration clause was governed by common law principles. Appellants do not contest that characterization on appeal. However, appellants contend that to interpret Rule 238 as not applying to uninsured motorist arbitration awards impermissibly segregates plaintiffs injured by uninsured motorists from all other plaintiffs in personal injury cases. Thus, they urge Rule 238’s applicability to them.

Greenspan v. United Services Automobile Association, 324 Pa.Super. 315, 471 A.2d 856 (1984) is dispositive of this case. By that decision, common law arbitration decisions *58 which are not attacked as resulting from an irregularity James D. Morrisey, Inc. v. Gross Construction Co., 297 Pa.Super. 151, 443 A.2d 344 (1982) or as unconstitutional or against public policy, United Services Automobile Association Appeal, 227 Pa.Super. 508, 323 A.2d 737 (1974), may not be modified or corrected by another tribunal.

This Court in Greenspan refused, acknowledging the Supreme Court’s constitutionally created rule-making power, to include common law arbitration within the ambit of Rule 238.

“If the Supreme Court had . desired a court of common pleas to have the authority to modify a common law arbitration award so as to affix ‘damages for delay,’ it could have made provisions for such a practice in the Rules of Civil Procedure.” Greenspan, supra, 324 Pa. Super. 315, 471 A.2d 856.

Thus, the order of the lower court, denying appellant McGee’s motion to modify the arbitrators’ award to include delay damages is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younkin v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
807 A.2d 275 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Hodges v. Rodriguez
645 A.2d 1340 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Davis v. Erie Insurance Group
12 Pa. D. & C.4th 459 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
Azpell v. Old Republic Insurance
555 A.2d 168 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Rizzo v. Haines
515 A.2d 321 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Wainauskis v. Howard Johnson Co.
488 A.2d 1117 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Hennessey v. American Mutual Insurance
475 A.2d 842 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 A.2d 1171, 327 Pa. Super. 56, 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-insurance-exchange-v-mcgee-pa-1984.