Erie Insurance Exchange v. Baker

952 A.2d 1163

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Erie Insurance Exchange v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 Pa. 355 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 2008·No. 531 WAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether Section 1738(a) of the MVFRL precludes the application of the so-called “household exclusion” to prevent inter-policy UIM stacking when there has been no valid waiver of stacking by the insured?

The Insurance Commissioner is invited to file an amicus brief in the above-captioned case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether Section 1738(a) of the MVFRL precludes the application of the so-called “household exclusion” to prevent inter-policy UIM stacking when there has been no valid waiver of stacking by the insured?

The Insurance Commissioner is invited to file an amicus brief in the above-captioned case.

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Baker, 952 A.2d 1163 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

952 A.2d 1163 (Erie Insurance Exchange v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.