Erie Insurance Exch. v. Mione, A.
This text of Erie Insurance Exch. v. Mione, A. (Erie Insurance Exch. v. Mione, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : No. 326 MAL 2021 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : ALBERT MIONE AND LISA MIONE, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioners, is:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in determining that the seminal decision of the Court in Gallagher v. Geico, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), which invalidated household exclusions in auto policies in Pennsylvania, did not apply to the underinsured motorist (“UIM) claims of Albert Mione under his Personal Auto Policy merely because the policy insuring the motorcycle he was operating at the time of the accident did not provide [UIM] coverage?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Erie Insurance Exch. v. Mione, A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-insurance-exch-v-mione-a-pa-2021.