Erie Ins. Exch. v. Moore
189 A.3d 382
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 10, 2018·No. 87 WAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
1. Does the Superior Court's ruling that shooting a person during a fight, in turn, during a planned murder-suicide, constituted an "occurrence" under a liability insurance policy conflict with Pennsylvania law as established by this Court?
2. Does the Superior Court's ruling conflict with its own decision in American National Property and Casualty Co. v. Hearn,93 A.3d 880 (Pa.Super. 2014), and misconstrue the intentional acts exclusion of a liability insurance policy?
3. Does the Superior Court's ruling conflict with Pennsylvania public policy, as stated in Mutual Benefit Ins. Co. v. Haver,555 Pa. 534 ,725 A.2d 743 , 747 (1999), that liability insurance does not cover damages caused as a result of evil or illegal conduct?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erie Ins. Exch. v. Moore, 189 A.3d 382 (Pa. 2018).
189 A.3d 382 (Erie Ins. Exch. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erie Ins., Aplt. v. Moore, T.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020