Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Ohio Supreme Court

Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey

2021 Ohio 980, 170 N.E.3d 32, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1274

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 29, 2021

Docket2019-1363

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 Ohio 980 (Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, 2021 Ohio 980, 170 N.E.3d 32, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1274 (Ohio 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-980.]

ERIE-HURON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY. [Cite as Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-980.] (No. 2019-1363—Submitted March 26, 2021—Decided March 29, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Kenneth Ronald Bailey, Attorney Registration No. 0009637, last known business address in Sandusky, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 16, 2020, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, 161 Ohio St.3d 146, 2020-Ohio-3701, 161 N.E.3d 590. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-980.]

ERIE-HURON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY. [Cite as Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-980.] (No. 2019-1363—Submitted March 26, 2021—Decided March 29, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Kenneth Ronald Bailey, Attorney Registration No. 0009637, last known business address in Sandusky, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 16, 2020, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey, 161 Ohio St.3d 146, 2020-Ohio-3701, 161 N.E.3d 590. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. ________________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2021 Ohio 980, 170 N.E.3d 32, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-huron-cty-bar-assn-v-bailey-ohio-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack