Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.

160 A.2d 405, 399 Pa. 76
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 1960·No. Appeal, 19·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action in assumpsit was tried to the court sitting without a jury by agreement of the parties. The court made specific findings - of fact and conclusions of law and found accordingly in favor of the plaintiff company in the sum of $28,266.84, with interest thereon from May 16, 1955. The defendant filed exceptions to the trial judge’s findings and conclusions, which exceptions, after argument thereon before the court en banc, were dismissed and judgment was entered on the trial court’s verdict for the plaintiff. The findings of the trial judge, having evidence to support them, and *77 having been confirmed by the court en banc, have the weight of a jury’s verdict and support the judgment in favor of the plaintiff company.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co., 160 A.2d 405, 399 Pa. 76 (Pa. 1960).

160 A.2d 405 (Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheatcroft v. Albert Co.
180 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Williams v. H. E. Stoudt & Son, Inc.
172 A.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)