Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.

160 A.2d 405, 399 Pa. 76

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 1960

DocketAppeal, 19

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 A.2d 405 (Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co., 160 A.2d 405, 399 Pa. 76 (Pa. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action in assumpsit was tried to the court sitting without a jury by agreement of the parties. The court made specific findings - of fact and conclusions of law and found accordingly in favor of the plaintiff company in the sum of $28,266.84, with interest thereon from May 16, 1955. The defendant filed exceptions to the trial judge’s findings and conclusions, which exceptions, after argument thereon before the court en banc, were dismissed and judgment was entered on the trial court’s verdict for the plaintiff. The findings of the trial judge, having evidence to support them, and *77 having been confirmed by the court en banc, have the weight of a jury’s verdict and support the judgment in favor of the plaintiff company.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action in assumpsit was tried to the court sitting without a jury by agreement of the parties. The court made specific findings - of fact and conclusions of law and found accordingly in favor of the plaintiff company in the sum of $28,266.84, with interest thereon from May 16, 1955. The defendant filed exceptions to the trial judge’s findings and conclusions, which exceptions, after argument thereon before the court en banc, were dismissed and judgment was entered on the trial court’s verdict for the plaintiff. The findings of the trial judge, having evidence to support them, and *77 having been confirmed by the court en banc, have the weight of a jury’s verdict and support the judgment in favor of the plaintiff company.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.2d 405, 399 Pa. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erie-coach-co-v-erie-bus-co-pa-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack