Ericson v. State
This text of 932 So. 2d 311 (Ericson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stephen W. ERICSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
PER CURIAM.
Stephen W. Ericson appeals the postconviction court's order denying his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). To resolve Mr. Ericson's jail credit claim requires factual determinations that are not apparent from the face of the record. Therefore, this claim may not be raised by a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Clifton v. State, 905 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the order without prejudice to any right Mr. Ericson might have to file a timely and facially sufficient sworn motion seeking jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Any such motion will not be deemed successive.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
932 So. 2d 311, 2006 WL 147394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ericson-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.