Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ERRATA
March 10, 2008
Appeal No. 2007-1168, Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp
Precedential Opinion
Decided: February 19, 2008
In the dissenting opinion at, page 5, line 20, in the paragraph beginning “As used by my colleagues,” the second sentence of that paragraph should read:
“Raising a “substantial question” concerning validity is not the same as . . .”
That is, after “validity” delete the comma and the word “it.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp. (Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.