Erickson's, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company

454 F.2d 884
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1972
Docket71-2899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 454 F.2d 884 (Erickson's, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erickson's, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, 454 F.2d 884 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We review on appeal 1 an award of damages by the lower court, D.C., 330 F.Supp. 380, based upon a Special Master’s Report, to Erickson’s, Inc. (Erickson’s), a plumbing, heating and air conditioning subcontractor of Peacock Construction Company (Peacock) against Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers) on a Labor and Material Payment Bond furnished by Peacock for the use, protection and payment of subcontractors and persons supplying labor and materials on a project for a governmental body. The project was the erection by *885 Peacock of a substantial addition to Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital Authority (Owner), Brunswick, Georgia.

The questions raised on appeal concern: (a) the propriety of the allowance by the Special Master and the court of pre-judgment interest on a portion of the award on which interest was allowed, having been determined by the trial court to be certain in amount, capable of computation, admittedly owed and “liquidated”; and (b) the action of the triál court requiring that the expenses of the Special Master’s fee be paid equally by the parties.

In neither particular has the appellant Travelers demonstrated error on the part of the trial court. The judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. This Court dealt with an earlier attempted appeal by Travelers, see The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Erickson’s, Inc., 5 Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 134, by dismissing the .appeal, on the ground that it was improvidently taken from an order not final under Title 28, U.S.C. Section 1291 and not an appealable interlocutory order under Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1292(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 F.2d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ericksons-inc-v-the-travelers-indemnity-company-ca5-1972.