Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/Erickson v. Schuster

Erickson v. Schuster

46 N.W. 914, 44 Minn. 441, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 393
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 1, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 N.W. 914 (Erickson v. Schuster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erickson v. Schuster, 46 N.W. 914, 44 Minn. 441, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 393 (Mich. 1890).

Opinion

By the Court.

In this action by a landlord to recover the monthly rent alleged to be due for the month of October, the complaint alleged that the term of the lease commenced on the 1st day of the preceding August. The proof showed that the term commenced on the 1st of September, and that the rent for that month had been [442]*442paid. The variance between the allegation and the proof was wholly immaterial, and the court did not err in disregarding it, and in finding the fact in accordance with the evidence. Gen. St. 1878, e. 66, § 121-

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Craigmile v. Sorenson
80 N.W.2d 45 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.W. 914, 44 Minn. 441, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erickson-v-schuster-minn-1890.