Erickson v. J & J Industries, Inc.

929 So. 2d 37, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5454, 2006 WL 941809
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2006·No. No. 5D05-2723·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Simpson v. Simpson, 232 So.2d 249, 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970) (noting when the evidence shows that there was an invisible substance (within a pool of water) which caused a party to slip and fall, negligence (including comparative negligence) becomes a question for the jury); Stock v. Gross, 186 So.2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966) (noting where the condition created by the defendant constituted a hidden trap (within an obviously dangerous condition such as a wet walkway), the facts presented a classic case for a jury decision as to plaintiffs contributory negligence); see also St. Pierre v. Public Gas Co., 423 So.2d 949, 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (“The question of apportioning the negligence between the plaintiff and the defendant is ... peculiarly within the province of the jury.... ”).

THOMPSON, SAWAYA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erickson v. J & J Industries, Inc., 929 So. 2d 37, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5454, 2006 WL 941809 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 37 (Erickson v. J & J Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Pierre v. Public Gas Co.
423 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Stock v. Gross
186 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Simpson v. Simpson
232 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)