Erickson v. Erickson
932 So. 2d 1240, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11489, 2006 WL 1888572
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of an Order on Writ of Civil Attachment. Because the trial court’s finding that appellant had the ability to pay the purge amount set is not supported by competent substantial evidence, we are constrained to reverse. See, e.g., Stebbins v. Stebbins, 754 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Perez v. Perez, 599 So.2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erickson v. Erickson, 932 So. 2d 1240, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11489, 2006 WL 1888572 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
932 So. 2d 1240 (Erickson v. Erickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stebbins v. Stebbins
754 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Perez v. Perez
599 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)