Erickson v. Erickson

668 So. 2d 1093, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2042, 1996 WL 91550

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the final order of dissolution of Mary Susan Erickson and James Edward Erickson. The parties entered into a stipulated agreement just prior to the final hearing; the agreement was recited at the hearing; the recitation contained no provision regarding the federal income tax deduction for the parties’ only child. The final judgment however contains a paragraph (six) relating to the federal income tax deduction. The inclusion in the final judgment of a provision that was not in the parties’ agreement is error. See Steiner v. Steiner, 638 So.2d 174, 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

We therefore reverse and remand for entry of a corrected final judgment, deleting paragraph six. We affirm in all other respects.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.