Erickson v. Antonucci

231 A.D.2d 946, 648 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10907

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of Supreme Court that, insofar as challenged by de[947] fendant, granted plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment and ordered defendant to pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,135. The record supports the court’s finding that defendant treated plaintiff in a cruel and inhuman manner by subjecting her to physical violence on several occasions (see, Brady v Brady, 64 NY2d 339, 345; Dalvi v Dalvi, 214 AD2d 641, 641-642; Tortorello v Tortorello, 133 AD2d 683; Rios v Rios, 34 AD2d 325, 326, affd 29 NY2d 840). There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the court abused its discretion in awarding plaintiff $1,135 in attorney’s fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.—Divorce.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erickson v. Antonucci, 231 A.D.2d 946, 648 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

231 A.D.2d 946 (Erickson v. Antonucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rios v. Rios
277 N.E.2d 786 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Brady v. Brady
476 N.E.2d 290 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Rios v. Rios
34 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Tortorello v. Tortorello
133 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Dalvi v. Dalvi
214 A.D.2d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)