Erick Kevin Beltran-Tovar v. the State of Texas
This text of Erick Kevin Beltran-Tovar v. the State of Texas (Erick Kevin Beltran-Tovar v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00040-CR
ERICK KEVIN BELTRAN-TOVAR, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 355th District Court Hood County, Texas Trial Court No. CR14462, Honorable Bryan T. Bufkin, Presiding
March 24, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Erick Kevin Beltran-Tovar, appeals from the trial court’s judgment
adjudicating him guilty of sexual assault of a child1 and sentencing him to twenty years of
confinement.2 Appellant’s brief was due February 27, 2026, but was not filed. By letter
of March 6, 2026, we admonished Appellant’s appointed counsel that failure to file a brief
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.011.
2 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 73.001. by March 16, 2026, would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to
the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel
has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary
arrangements for filing a brief;
4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
7. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
8. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 23, 2026.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before the date the trial court acts per
our directive, he shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Erick Kevin Beltran-Tovar v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erick-kevin-beltran-tovar-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.