Erick Herman Santos-Valdez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 13, 2012·No. 14-12-01021-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed December 13, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01021-CR

ERICK HERMAN SANTOS-VALDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11CR1634

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed December 4, 2012, but no reporter’s record has been filed. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record contains appellant’s First Amended Motion for New Trial filed November 13, 2012, more than thirty days after appellant was sentenced on October 9, 2012. The record does not contain appellant’s first motion for new trial. The motion is necessary for the court to determine whether a motion for new trial was timely

filed so as to extend time for filing the reporter’s record in this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.2(b).

The Galveston County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before December 28, 2012, containing appellant’s first motion for new trial.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erick Herman Santos-Valdez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Erick Herman Santos-Valdez v. State (Erick Herman Santos-Valdez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.