Erich Norris v. Starbuck's Corp., D/B/A Starbuck's Coffee Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2004
Docket13-03-00605-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Erich Norris v. Starbuck's Corp., D/B/A Starbuck's Coffee Company (Erich Norris v. Starbuck's Corp., D/B/A Starbuck's Coffee Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erich Norris v. Starbuck's Corp., D/B/A Starbuck's Coffee Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-605-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


ERICH NORRIS,                                                                Appellant,


v.


STARBUCK’S CORP., D/B/A STARBUCK’S

COFFEE COMPANY,                                                           Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 165th District Court

of Harris County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion for extension of time to file notice of restricted appeal. Appellant relies on Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 as authority for permitting him to bring an appeal within six months of the judgment.

         Appellant originally filed an appeal from a summary judgment taken against him in his lawsuit against Starbuck’s Corp. d/b/a Starbuck’s Coffee Company. On December 3, 2002, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth District of Texas dismissed his appeal for want of prosecution. The mandate was issued on February 10, 2003. Appellant is now attempting to appeal the opinion and judgment of the Sixth Court of Appeals.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file notice of restricted appeal and the appeal are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM


Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of February, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Erich Norris v. Starbuck's Corp., D/B/A Starbuck's Coffee Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erich-norris-v-starbucks-corp-dba-starbucks-coffee-texapp-2004.