Erica Rane Bowling v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2019
Docket05-18-00899-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Erica Rane Bowling v. State (Erica Rane Bowling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erica Rane Bowling v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 27, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00899-CR

ERICA RANE BOWLING, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-82504-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Appellant Erica Rane Bowling waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to aggravated assault

with a deadly weapon, a knife. The trial court assessed punishment at twelve years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous

and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no

arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel

Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy

of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did

not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

(noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

180899F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ERICA RANE BOWLING, Appellant On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-18-00899-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 199-82504-2017. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Brown and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 27th day of March, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Erica Rane Bowling v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erica-rane-bowling-v-state-texapp-2019.