ERIC SPIVEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2022·No. 21-1647·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1647 Lower Tribunal No. F12-7599 ________________

Eric Spivey, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Eric Spivey, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, we grant

rehearing and withdraw the opinion of January 26, 2022, consider

Appellant’s timely filed initial brief and substitute the following opinion in its

place.

Affirmed. See Cregg v. State, 43 So. 3d 818, 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)

(“When a consecutive sentence is pronounced, the defendant is not entitled

to credit for time served on an antecedent sentence.” (citing Daniels v. State,

491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ERIC SPIVEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

ERIC SPIVEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (ERIC SPIVEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
491 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Cregg v. State
43 So. 3d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)