ERIC SCHRAMM v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 2018
Docket15-5913
StatusPublished

This text of ERIC SCHRAMM v. State of Florida (ERIC SCHRAMM v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ERIC SCHRAMM v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D15-5913 _____________________________

ERIC SCHRAMM,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Ross Goodman, Judge.

February 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Novaton v. State, 634 So. 2d 607, 609 (Fla. 1994) (holding that a double-jeopardy claim is waived when the defendant enters into a negotiated plea agreement).

RAY, MAKAR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant/Cross- Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee/Cross- Appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Novaton v. State
634 So. 2d 607 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ERIC SCHRAMM v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-schramm-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.