Eric Samuel Tucker v. State

Opinion

PILED IN 1STCOURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS ZCK) fojp jRim ; \^_ APPALS JUL 30 2015" 3"Vlf)ax^L [^TtRxot Cauftx CHRISTOPHER ArPRINE" CLERK \MlX£ ^J^^y^V

GZxCS TUOcCfl (As*JJ&£>i~15~0^rH-C&

^gra^l Tb S€r kSsoE- iNDT:erMfc*fr ; ftRpgyr JUfAEB^jf

Ift.TtMb \^WSL£ ^UhCt CFTUF. toJffT :

^^reTK^hfT; Mgfer 3ur^cLHorr Mo te&tessts TmSkmL^^&u^jSi

I

n

*>v»

' c uII »i < N«.ktt»*ia>) si K»i

A tv\^>I uv^t uco> accuseo '_ : _ ^__

-^ >^>-> .&>» •"•n*. ..*^ '"«>•,. t, ,j<

flORTrt HOJ..&"ToRi TX ^^^tn^H :-?i. ;V-:"'" J *'iuv.—.MJ>" ^H Wyjsar •TO SI. 11. "1/V1 IT pVl .',"' I -».;^,,.^'« EfSSgC'

RECEIVED FIRST COURT OF APPEALS Sox M ^ Sitter HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUL 3 0 2015

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ICLERK,

.•* / «3Q| ^ *^* • •£•• £»•"jj -^4 ii,i.,i.l..,ii.,n|,i|ti>tlii|.i|,t|]ii.iu)i.|).i||,|,i,ii|iii|> FILED IN 1STCOURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUL3T20I5 CHRISTOPHER ArPRiNE" CLERK Wlflxr, ^jiNiT^^y^^

O^nLS TuOiCd CRSr^Ol-^'Q^^-C^

BM^&dJo^SnLkSrak_»!L&ierM^^4_^B^5rJly5itBMl

laTHfe Sjtettb&fo£ *$]&£, Cg^DML taJffT ;

lOSggv^gg Water 3UftCLMC*tr Mo hmMisz^jmi,SA£^^s^u^jSi

f^&CaftflXO ^XC^kIoc, Xs arUQl T^Ms! Uttftr Zv\ kCOJ^rxy or

II

*• PRg, - Cfturxow -tq c4ccx My CatJSu^PTTa^ XkI Pu&U&jg. NChttJ&»ta>)

*» PR&- CftuTxp^ of (v KfSfc u&uh per gfl. iftiTftL fret, SQgjymiJCf. T^Si^iy

TVW UV^KT Ufr6 MfrJSCO J : •

* >->->- .>flVftI«/,S

feSPCCrFULLW 3UBnx-n£0 OfrlS TyqKfc 1J8J%I SVWS 3<5(oQ<^ 3S"fM &€<\UhOKfr-> ry Tt&5 HFJXr M^T ..„**•»—-Nw _^™-*»„.

3 '"io '.''» n ":u"*4-j tr i'-f.t'-i .1": j *-fMl!" •0«,- «./>'

8*MJf»OKfr^ TV TII-qS ™^

RECEIVED

SojPfvrWw Sitter |F,RSK«^ALS lU)Wj TO

MI

ii«lM''l"i'.i'i,,l»,ii|'¥»i»,lilll,H»,H'l,',h«li'i»l,»i«