Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Counterclaim

26 F.3d 137, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5101, 1994 WL 89034
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 15, 1994·No. 93-1541·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

26 F.3d 137

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Eric P. GOLDWASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SMITH CORONA CORPORATION and Smith Corona Acer, Defendants-Appellees.
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 93-1541.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 15, 1994.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36. No sanctions.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Counterclaim, 26 F.3d 137, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5101, 1994 WL 89034 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

26 F.3d 137 (Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Counterclaim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fenn v. Yale University
283 F. Supp. 2d 615 (D. Connecticut, 2003)