Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Counterclaim
This text of 26 F.3d 137 (Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Counterclaim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
26 F.3d 137
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Eric P. GOLDWASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SMITH CORONA CORPORATION and Smith Corona Acer, Defendants-Appellees.
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 93-1541.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 15, 1994.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges:
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36. No sanctions.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F.3d 137, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5101, 1994 WL 89034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-p-goldwasser-v-smith-corona-corporation-and-s-cafc-1994.