Eric Ndubueze Ufom v. West Wynde Health Services, Inc., Gladys Ibik and John Ibik

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2015·No. 14-14-00438-CV·Published

Opinion

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS

JUN 30 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE I CLERK •DIGADIL1TIEG INTERNATIONAL

June27,2015

THE CLERK ^^^M^^m^ TT.E11 TH Courtof 14™ r- . _£ Appeals a ^ _ „„I„ L I *7 t *}- Houston, Texas

Dear Clerk of Court, 14th Court of Appeals, RE: ERIC NDUBUEZE UFOM v. WEST WYNDE HEALTH SERVICES CASE # 14-14-00438-cv

JUSTICE DELAYED IS CONSTITUTIONALLY JUSTICE DENIED

This letter is to officially notify this honorable court of appeals that, On

Friday, May 1, 2015, at 6:03:43pm O'clock, I timely mailed my postpaid,

properly addressed, Emergency Motion to this honorable Court through the

United States Postal Service Certify Mail # 70130600000009190471,

automated 24 hours, after Hours, posting machine services before 12:00

midnight of that last day of filling of filling Motion for En Banc Rehearing

Please see the annexed Exhibit 1, copy of the USPS postage transaction #

106, receipt #480378-9550 and Certify mail# 70130600000009190471,

which are proves beyond reasonable doubt that the Appellant's motion was

timely filed on a weekend of Friday, May 1, 2015.

It is sad and unconstitutional that this honorable Appellate Court, whose

duty is to be a gatekeeper, has failed to correctly file my timely motion, as « P.O. BOX 710455 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77271 PH: (832) 758-0612 E-Mail: erpdi@yahoo.com / EQUAL RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES INTERNATIONAL

having been filed on the date of May 1, 2015, which it was timely mailed,

but incorrectly or wrongfully filed my timely motion as having been mailed

on the date of May 5, 2015, which was the date this Court actually received

my mailed timely motion and not the date it was mailed. It is discrimination,

disparate treatment, denial of meaningful access to court of Appeals,

selective enforcement of Appellate Court's rules and regulations, denial of

activities, programs and services, in violations of Title II of the Americans

with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which provides: "[N]o qualified

individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded

from participation or denied the benefits of the services, programs or

activities of a public entity," 42 U. S. C. §12132 and ADA 12203 that

Prohibits Against Retaliation or Coercion (Section 503), Title V, [No

person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has

opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such

individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in

a investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter] and [It shall be

unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in CD

the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or « P.O. BOX 710455 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77271 PH: (832) 758-0612 E-Mail: erpdi@yahoo.com Q

EQUAL RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES INTERNATIONAL

enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other

individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by

this chapter].

Therefore, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 316

(Tex.R.Civ.P., 21a (METHOD OF SERVICE) (lb) (WHEN COMPLETED:

(1) Services by mail or Commercial Delivery Service Shall be complete

upon deposit of the document postpaid and properly addressed, in the mail

or with commercial delivery service), I humbly and respectfully request

from this honorable court to go back and retrieve the Appellant's original

envelop used in mailing this motion that is under the custody of the Court,

and verify the date on the postpaid USPS stamp on the mailing envelop and

thereafter, correct the incorrect date of filling on the court's docket. Also,

please properly and correctly stamp on my timely motion, the date of May 1,

2015, as mandated by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 316 (Tex.R.Civ.P.,

21a (METHOD OF SERVICE) (lb) (WHEN COMPLETED: (1) Services

by mail or Commercial Delivery Service Shall be complete upon deposit of

the document postpaid and properly addressed, in the mail or with CO

commercial delivery service). « P.O. BOX 710455 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77271 PH: (832) 758-0612 E-Mail: erpdi@yahoo.com 9

Also, the attached please find copies of my June 26, 2015, United States

Postal Service, Certify Mail # 70110470000080139256, used in timely

mailing my Pro Se Motion for En Banc reconsideration of the Court's

unconstitutional decision of, "NO ACTION TAKEN," on June 11, 2015, on

the Appellant's timely filed Emergency Pro Se Motion for En Banc

Rehearing on, Friday, May 1, 2015, at 6:03:43pm O'clock, through the

United States Postal Service Certify Mail # 70130600000009190471;

pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 316 (Tex.R.Civ.P., 21a

(METHOD OF SERVICE) (lb) (WHEN COMPLETED: (1) Services by

mail or Commercial Delivery Service Shall be complete upon deposit of the

document postpaid and properly addressed, in the mail or with commercial

delivery service;); Tex.R.App.P. 19.2; Tex.R.App.P. 19.3; Tex.R.App.P.

19.4; Discriminations, Retaliations, Disparate Treatments, Selective

Enforcement of the State of Texas and United States Constitution, District

Clerk of Court's filling Rules and Regulations, due process of law, faire

procedure, and equal protections constitutional rights safeguards, as well as

to be free from continued cruel and unusual punishments, pursuant to,

Affordable Care Act, Americans with Disability Act (ADA); Title II of the « P.O. BOX 710455 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77271 PH: (832) 758-0612 E-Mail: erpdi@yahoo.com EQUAL RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES INTERNATIONAL

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which provides: "[N]o

qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be

excluded from participation or denied the benefits of the services, programs

or activities of a public entity," 42 U. S. C. §12132 and ADA 12203 that

Prohibits Against Retaliation or Coercion (Section 503), Title V, [No

person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has

opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such

individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in

a investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter] and [It shall be

unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in

the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or

enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other

individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by

this chapter], U.S. Supreme Court's Trilogy of cases, governing the

admissibility of scientific evidence in, Daubert v. Marrel Dow

Pharmaceuticals, Inc 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric v. Joiner,

522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 v. 137 (1999). LO QJ

Thanks £ P.O.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric Ndubueze Ufom v. West Wynde Health Services, Inc., Gladys Ibik and John Ibik, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Eric Ndubueze Ufom v. West Wynde Health Services, Inc., Gladys Ibik and John Ibik (Eric Ndubueze Ufom v. West Wynde Health Services, Inc., Gladys Ibik and John Ibik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)
General Electric Co. v. Joiner
522 U.S. 136 (Supreme Court, 1997)