Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan

Ninth Circuit

Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan

797 F.3d 654, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13979, 2015 WL 4747311

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 10, 2015

Docket09-99017

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 797 F.3d 654 (Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan, 797 F.3d 654, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13979, 2015 WL 4747311 (9th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this ease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

797 F.3d 654, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13979, 2015 WL 4747311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-mann-v-charles-ryan-ca9-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack