Eric L Vandussen v. Court of Appeals

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 142950·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 27, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

142950 & (3) Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly ERIC L. VANDUSSEN, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff, Justices

v SC: 142950

COURT OF APPEALS, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered and, in lieu of granting relief at this time, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to articulate the reason why “the fair administration of justice” warrants the denial of the plaintiff’s request to film oral argument on May 10, 2011. Administrative Order 1989-1(2)(b).

We retain jurisdiction. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall issue an order on or before May 2, 2011, and shall immediately file a copy of that order with the Clerk of the Supreme Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 27, 2011 _________________________________________ y0427 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric L Vandussen v. Court of Appeals, (Mich. 2011).

Eric L Vandussen v. Court of Appeals (Eric L Vandussen v. Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.