Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez

DecidedNovember 16, 2021

Docket01-21-00417-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez (Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01-21-00417-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-21465

Trial court: 308th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from the trial court’s May 4, 2021 judgment and an order signed on August 16, 2021. Appellant appealed on August 2, 2021 and August 31, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The record was therefore due on September 1, 2021. See id. 35.1(a). On September 7, 2021, the District Clerk informed the Court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See id. 37.3(b). On September 9, 2021, we notified appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed, and we gave appellant until October 11, 2021 to show that the appellant had made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. Despite our notice, the clerk’s record has not been filed. On November 5, 2021, appellant filed “Appellant’s Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief” in which he requests a 60-day extension to file a brief and acknowledges that the clerk’s record has not yet been filed. Because the clerk’s record has not been filed, appellant’s brief is not yet due and accordingly, we dismiss “Appellant’s Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief” as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Nevertheless, we further notify appellant that the deadline for filing the clerk’s record has passed and that, unless appellant submits written evidence from the trial court clerk showing that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record within 10 days of the date of this order, we may dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: ___November 16, 2021_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01-21-00417-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-21465

Trial court: 308th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from the trial court’s May 4, 2021 judgment and an order signed on August 16, 2021. Appellant appealed on August 2, 2021 and August 31, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The record was therefore due on September 1, 2021. See id. 35.1(a). On September 7, 2021, the District Clerk informed the Court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See id. 37.3(b). On September 9, 2021, we notified appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed, and we gave appellant until October 11, 2021 to show that the appellant had made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. Despite our notice, the clerk’s record has not been filed. On November 5, 2021, appellant filed “Appellant’s Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief” in which he requests a 60-day extension to file a brief and acknowledges that the clerk’s record has not yet been filed. Because the clerk’s record has not been filed, appellant’s brief is not yet due and accordingly, we dismiss “Appellant’s Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief” as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Nevertheless, we further notify appellant that the deadline for filing the clerk’s record has passed and that, unless appellant submits written evidence from the trial court clerk showing that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record within 10 days of the date of this order, we may dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: ___November 16, 2021_____

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Eric John Ramirez v. Juanita Sanchez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-john-ramirez-v-juanita-sanchez-texapp-2021.