Eric J. Schmidt, an Individual, and v. Wallenius Line, a Corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a Corporation, And

Ninth Circuit

Eric J. Schmidt, an Individual, and v. Wallenius Line, a Corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a Corporation, And

455 F.2d 1088

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1972

Docket25674

StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 1088 (Eric J. Schmidt, an Individual, and v. Wallenius Line, a Corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a Corporation, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eric J. Schmidt, an Individual, and v. Wallenius Line, a Corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a Corporation, And, 455 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

455 F.2d 1088

Eric J. SCHMIDT, an individual, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
WALLENIUS LINE, a corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc.,
a corporation, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 25674.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1972.

Ernest M. Thayer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard E. Gutting, Jr. (argued), Gilbert C. Wheat, of Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN,* Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The order dismissing for want of diligent prosecution is affirmed. The trial court has a broad discretion in such matters and we cannot say its action was clearly erroneous.

*

J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

455 F.2d 1088

Eric J. SCHMIDT, an individual, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
WALLENIUS LINE, a corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc.,
a corporation, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 25674.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1972.

Ernest M. Thayer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard E. Gutting, Jr. (argued), Gilbert C. Wheat, of Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN,* Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The order dismissing for want of diligent prosecution is affirmed. The trial court has a broad discretion in such matters and we cannot say its action was clearly erroneous.

*

J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 F.2d 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-j-schmidt-an-individual-and-v-wallenius-line-a-corporation-fred-ca9-1972.